#Somalia: The meaning of the "Treatening Edicts" of Puntland...
#Somalia: The meaning of the "Treatening Edicts" of Puntland...: I am sorry to say but MR. Farole do not have any real knowledge of the Somali provisional constitution and he has not powers to amend ...
The meaning of the "Treatening Edicts" of Puntland Leader Mr.Farole.
I am sorry to say but MR. Farole do not have any real knowledge of the Somali provisional constitution and he has not powers to amend it as he sees it.This " Threatening Edicts" he always says on the
Media are totally worthless when we talk about the existence and sovereignty under International Law of the
Somali Federal government. Let me say its cheap
talk in other words he is always portraying the Somali republic as a
Land inhibited by Clans and not people- citizens who can understand the
Law and the meaning of the Unity of the Somali Republic in Law and the
Unity of its people-citizens in Culture, Religion and Ancestry.If we
talk only about the Law there is not any article which permits Mr. Farole to go to international meetings as "we were two different
Republics" in one System. Going at the meeting in Brussels on September(
the Somali federal government and the region-state of Puntland) will mean
there are two governments and "sovereignty" in Somalia.Nobody has
tempered with the Law and have changed any article he just trying to
look for "expedients" which are not existing.In Somalia there are
different region states like Puntland which the Constitution explicitly
mentions and accommodates but also the Constitutions says the Unity of Somalia is"
inviolable and indivisible".The Somali federal government is for all and
is a "sole" representative of the National and Public interest of all
Somalia.For a very long time the Agenda of the Ethiopia-IGAD hegemonic
group to make and think the Somalis through the" utterances" of their
Leaders and Warlords that they are "different entities legally" and is what
Mr. Farole repeating all the time.The game plan of Farole and others
like him is to have Somalia subdivided in five or six states which are
under the umbrella of a Confederate system. He cannot tell to the
Somalis that game plan but uses the "story" that the real meaning of the
Constitution is a Confederate System which is not true.There are behind him OIL and Gas
companies who would like to subdivide Somalia to get new "concessional
rights" in Puntland and other regions.Just to give you an example last
year Mr. Farole has hired a Lobby Company in the US to " change" the
"concessional rights" of the "Conoco Philips company has got in HOLHOL
area.To change and renew it under a new "concessional rights" issued by the
region state of Puntland( under this constitution only the federal government has that right). Secondly by subdividing Somalia Farole is
working for those who wont to Recolonize Somalia and make Somalia where
the people speak Amhara and Swahili as national Languages and its
people-communities made to live under so-called Vassal States controlled
and subject to Ethiopia-IGAD group.On his last "utterance" he is
trying to cover the internal crisis in Puntland in which the
Communities have stopped his Agenda of a new dictatorship through a
concocted election next month in that region of the Somali Republic.Wait and see.
In Defense Of Somali Territorial waters-from Somalitalk.com Pages.
In defense of Somali territorial waters-from Somalitalk.com pages
UN REPORTS: S/2013/413
12 July 2013
"Once Somalia adopts the EEZ under the UNCLOS regime, Somalia and Kenya would be required to initiate a separate process to negotiate a mutually acceptable maritime boundary. This would open the possibility of an adjustment of the maritime boundary from its perpendicular position towards a position following the line of latitude. Such a shift would effectively place some if not all of the disputed licenses mentioned above back into Kenyan waters. It is for this reason that on 8 October 2011 the Somali MPs voted down attempts to introduce an EEZ during the Roadmap process." UN Report, July 12, 2013.
Conflict between Somalia and Kenya over the maritime boundary
Somalia and Kenya have differing interpretations of their maritime boundary and associated offshore territorial rights. Currently, Somalia claims its maritime boundary with Kenya lies perpendicular to the coast, though this boundary is not enshrined in a mutually accepted agreement with Kenya, which envisages the maritime boundary as being defined by the line of latitude protruding from its boundary with Somalia.25
Map of disputed offshore zone between Somalia and Kenya, including positions of Kenyan issued oil licenses.
The FGS has thus refused to recognise oil licenses granted to multinational companies by Kenya and which protrude into waters defined as Somali according to that perpendicular demarcation line. Oil multinational companies affected by the FGS opposition have included French oil company Total (Kenyan license L22), Italian major ENI (Kenyan licenses L21, L23 and L24), US oil firm Anadarko (Kenyan license L5) and Norway’s majority state-funded Statoil26 (Kenyan license L26) (see again annex 5.5.k for a more detailed map of disputed oil licenses).
Corruption Risks
Conflicts of interest surrounding the adoption of an Exclusive Economic Zone for Somalia (EEZ).
Qodobadii uu shir guddoonku ka akhriyey Baarlamaanka October 8, 2011 kuma aysan jirin in badda Soomaaliya lagu soo koobayo 12 mayl-badeed oo Territorial Waters ah. Laakiin.... Since 1972, Somalia has claimed an extension of its territorial sea from 12 to 200 nautical miles. However, article 3 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) limits coastal States to claim a maximum territorial sea of 12 nautical miles from the coast. Although Somalia signed UNCLOS in 1982, there has been considerable confusion over whether Somalia’s national legislation has been harmonised to give recognition to the UNCLOS regime.28 On 1 May 2013, however, President Hassan Sheikh issued a statement announcing that the FGS has identified a 1988 law which puts Somalia fully in compliance with UNCLOS, and which would allow Somalia to implement an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), where territorial control would be limited to 12 nautical miles but where Somalia would continue to claim sovereign rights to explore, exploit, conserve and manage natural resources that exist within 200 nautical miles of its coast.
The Monitoring Group understands that Kenya suspended Norwegian oil company Statoil from block L26 in late 2012, as the company was unwilling to meet financial obligations of developing exploration activities in the block while legal uncertainty prevailed over the Kenyan-Somali maritime boundary.31 However, a Kenyan Government official has confirmed that Statoil has nevertheless expressed interest in returning to develop L26 should the maritime boundary dispute be resolved in favour of Kenya.32
The Monitoring Group has obtained information of attempts by the Norwegian Government to influence Somali parliamentarians and other FGS officials to adopt the EEZ for Somalia, which, as explained above, would lead to a separate process of redrawing of the maritime boundary towards a line of latitude.
Indeed, between 6 and 13 April 2013, two non-governmental organisations, the Oslo Center and the National Democratic Institute, hosted several Somali MPs, including the FGS speaker of parliament and Norwegian national, Mohamed Osman Jawari, on a Study Tour for the Federal Parliament of Somalia, in Oslo. The week-long programme included a briefing on the SFF by Norway’s Special Envoy to Somalia, Jens Mjuagedal, and Senior Advisor, Rina Kristmoen, as well as a briefing on Norwegian legal assistance to Somalia for the establishment of an internationally-recognized EEZ. Former Norwegian oil minister Einar Steensnaes also briefed on the issue of management of natural resources (see annex 5.5.l. for programme on page 170 of the UN S/2013/413 Report). (Note: Annex 5.5.l: is about "Programme of Study Tour of Somali MPs in Oslo 6 – 13 April 2013.")
In this way, Norway’s development assistance to Somalia may therefore be used as a cover for its commercial interests there. Norway’s Minister of International Development, Heikki Eidsvol HolmÃ¥s has, however, publicly denied any link between Norway’s assistance to Somalia in establishing its continental shelf rights and any commercial oil interest.34
- Source: Somalia report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea - http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2013/413
"Norway has for many years provided extensive assistance to Somalia both humanitarian, as well as to support efforts for peace and reconciliation and for reconstruction and development of a country who has suffered so much from hungers and wars. This has been a consistent policy aiming towards a more stable and peaceful Somalia, in which the Somali people may begin to enjoy security and hopes for a more prosperous future.
It is therefore with serious concern that we understand the Monitoring Group in its Report to the Security Council is conveying some conspiratory allegations, found on the internet, implying that Norwegian assistance to Somalia is a cover to promote the commercial interests of some Norwegian oil companies. This is both unfounded and untrue."
Adding "We are aware that the Norwegian oil company Statoil has showed some interest in possible future oil concessions in Kenya, but the Norwegian Government has always advised the company not to apply for such concessions in any areas where there may be a potential legal dispute, and when realizing that this was the case with the mentioned L26 block, Statoil decided not to get involved."MORE AT Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Website.
AKHRI: Waa Maxay Faraqa u Dhexeeya Dhul-badeedka (Territorial Sea) iyo Aagga Dhaqaalaha (EEZ)?
__________
References:
25 Kenya claims that a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with Somalia’s TFG in April 2009 set the border running east along the line of latitude. However, Somalia claims that the purpose of the MoU was not to demarcate the maritime boundary but rather to grant non-objection to Kenya’s May 2009 submission of claim? to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf to delineate the outer limits of Kenya’s continental shelf beyond the 200 nautical mile limit. (Each country’s claim requires proof of cooperation with its neighbors.) Since it was not ratified by the parliament, Somalia claimed that the MoU did not, in fact, have legal basis. Somalia’s parliament rejected this MoU in August 2009, claiming that Somalia was adhering to the appropriate requirements for delimitation of the continental shelf – not agreeing to a maritime boundary with Kenya. See Lesley Anne Warner, “East Africa’s Oil/Gas Rush Highlights Kenya- Somalia Maritime Border Dispute”, available at http://lesleyannewarner.wordpress.com/2012/07/21/east-africas-oilgas-rush-highlights-kenyasomalia-maritime-border-dispute/ . On the 6 June 2013, the Office of the Prime Minister in Somalia issued a statement saying that the council of ministers had decided that The Federal Government of Somalia does not consider it appropriate to open new discussions on maritime demarcation or limitations on the continental shelf with any parties.
26 Seehttp://www.statoil.com/annualreport2011/en/shareholderinformation/pages/majorshareholders.aspx for precise statistics on Norwegian government holdings in Statoil.
28 See Thilo Neumann and Tim Rene Salomon, “Fishing in Troubled Waters – Somalia’s Maritime Zones and the Case for Reinterpretation”, Insights, American Society of International Law, 15 March 2012.
29 According to a maritime lawyer interviewed by the Monitoring Group on 22 April 2013, should Somali MPs vote for an EEZ, the boundary would be identified through a process of negotiation between the Somali and Kenyan Governments under international mediation, and would likely shift from a perpendicular position towards a position of latitude, given previous precedent set in the East African region, particularly in relation to the Tanzanian-Kenyan maritime border.
30 Seehttp://www.garoweonline.com/artman2/publish/Somalia_27/Somalia_The_Roadmap_Gets_a_Tear_on_the_EEZ.shtml .
31 Kenyan Energy ministry Permanent Secretary, Patrick Nyoike was quoted in the financial press on 5 November 2012 as suggesting Statoil was relieved of L26 due to failing to honour a 3-D seismic development plan, seehttp://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/Kenya-expels-oil-giant-Statoil-from-exploration-plan-/-/539550/1612432/-/708r31z/-/index.html . However, a Kenyan Government official interviewed in April 2013, said he had been informed that Statoil did not want to take the risk of developing L26 while the maritime boundary was still in legal dispute.
32 Interview , 12 May 2013.
33 See Norwegian Foreign Ministry website: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/ud/press/news/2009/shelf_assistance.html?id=555771 .
L26 was negotiated in 2012, seehttp://www.trademarksa.org/news/norwegian-firm-statoil-joins-search-oil-kenya .
34 Seehttp://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a6d5d1b6-bd9f-11e2-a735-00144feab7de.html .
###END###
Waa Maxay Faraqa u Dhexeeya Dhul-badeedka (Territorial Sea) iyo Aagga Dhaqaalaha (EEZ)?
REMEMBER: June 6, 2013: Somali Federal Government clarifies its position on territorial waters
The government’s position is Somali Law No. 37 on the Territorial Sea and Ports, signed on 10 September 1972, which defines Somali territorial sea as 200 nautical miles and continental shelf. On 24th July 1989 Somali ratified the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Faahfaahin
Faafin: SomaliTalk.com | July 21, 2013
Baarlamaanka Soomaaliya oo si kulul uga dooday Sharciga Cusub ee Kalluumaysiga iyo Xeerka Badda Soomaaliya ee Law No. 37
Qoraalladii Wareeggii hore ee Difaaca Badda Soomaaliya
DIFAACA BADDA: WAREEGGII-1aad 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | WAREEGGA-LABAAD | BAARID | SEARCH
La soo xiriir:
Xildhibaanada ka hadlay xeerka badda Soomaaliya ee Law No. 37
Sharciga cusub ee Kalluumaysiga ee horyaalla baarlamaanka Soomaaliya halkan ka eeg
Ra'iisal Wasaaraha Soomaaliya oo ka Laabtay Go'aankii Sharciga Badda ee ay Gaareen June 6, 2013?
June 15, 2013: Ra’iisul Wasaare Shirdoon oo xiiskiisa ku qaabilay R.Wasaarihii hore ee Norway
Ra'iisul Wasaare Shirdoon: Baarlamaanka ha la Weydiiyo in Dastuurka Qaranka lagu daro Xeerka Badda Soomaaliyeed ee Law No. 37
Wareegtadii Ra'iisul Wasaare Cumar C/rashiid ku wargeliyey QM in baarlamaanka Soomaaliya diideen MOU-gii badda
Jariidadda Standard oo soo Bandhigtay Caddaynta Saxiixii Labada Wasiir (Fowsiya & Aamina), kuna tilmaantay MoU ay kala saxiixdeen labada wasiir ee Arrimaha Dibadda
Xukuumada Federaaliga ah ee Soomaaliya waxay aqoonsan tahay sharciga qaran ee badaha Law No. 37. ee qeexaya dhererka xadka badda “territorial water” ee gaaraya 200 mayl-badeed iyo continental shelf . Waxay dawlada Soomaaliya ogolaatay xeerka badaha aduunka ee ay wax ka saxiixday 24kii Luuliyo 1989 ayadoo aan ka tanaasulin sharciga qaran.akhri....
SomaliTalk.com miyaa Buun-Buunisay Badda Soomaaliya, mase Fowsiya Xaaji ayaan ku Baraarugsanayn waxa ku Qoran Heshiiska ay la Saxiixday Kenya
#Somalia: Somalia Republic and “Somaliland” regional authori...
#Somalia: Somalia Republic and “Somaliland” regional authori...: Introduction From the last months of the former transitional government of President Sherif (2009-2012) there was meeti...
#Somalia: Somalia Republic and “Somaliland” regional authori...
#Somalia: Somalia Republic and “Somaliland” regional authori...: Introduction From the last months of the former transitional government of President Sherif (2009-2012) there was meeti...
Somalia Republic and “Somaliland” regional authorities becoming two different legal, “Sovereign entities”? Wait and see
Introduction
From the last months of the former
transitional government of President Sherif (2009-2012) there was
meetings/negotiations between the Somali federal government and the regional “authority”
of Somaliland regions. The government of former President Sherif and the government of President Hassan
Sheik which has been given a full recognition by the international Community
like the UN, EU, US, Arab League as the “sole representative” of the sovereignty
of the Somali Republic have both taken a “wrong legal, political approach” and
strategy in meetings/negotiations vis-vis the regional “Somaliland” authority.
Last Monday/Tuesday (8-9 June 2013) we
had another meeting/negotiations in Turkey between two delegations representing
the “two parties” as their spokesmen telling the Media and the Somali people-citizens.
First of all
let me start with (1) what are the legal Constitutional principles which must
guide the meetings/negotiations,(2) the format of the meetings,(3) including
the Agendas during the negotiations.
Legal
Constitutional Principles.
One of the Somali federal government founding
legal principles is the Rule of the Law (art 3).In other words every act/policy
of the Somali government must be based on the Law and in this special case on what the Constitution says.
The article (4.C1) on the Supremacy of the Constitution says: “After the Shari’ah(Islamic
Law principles) the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Somalia is the
Supreme Law of the Country. It binds and guides Policy initiatives and
decisions in all department of government.”
More to that
at article (7) titled:” The territory of the federal Republic of Somalia “at (C1)”
is written that “The sovereignty of the Fderal Republic of Somalia extends over
all the territory of the federal Republic of Somalia which includes The Land,
Territorial sea, the Islands, the Subsoil, the Airspace and the Continental shelf
and any Land and Waters that join the federal Republic of Somalia. In
accordance with a law that shall be passed by the federal parliament. Also (C2)
says:” the Territory of the federal Republic of Somalia is Inviolable and Indivisible”;
At (C4) says”
The boundaries of the federal Republic of Somalia shall be those described in
the 1960 Constitution of Somalia”.
All this
articles must be the guiding Constitutional principles of the Somali Federal
Republic government in any act/policy or even negotiations. But unfortunately we
can see that maybe for naivety or incompetence doubled by negligence they have
not been considerate even before and during the so-called
meetings/negotiations.
The format of the meetings were totally
wrong because there not any consideration on what are meant this meetings/negotiations.
On what protocols the two delegations were meeting? What is the legal definition
of the Somali federal Republic in these meetings? That Somalia is the “sole sovereign
power of Somalia which has been recognized under International Law”? What is
the Legal definition of “Somaliland”? Where its territory and jurisdiction is situated?
Under what legal definition they are at the meetings? Who recognized them?
The Agendas of the meetings have never
been agreed before hand and prepared by the Somali federal government.The
Somali federal government has not got a clear plan of negotiations and what is
the end-game except the concept of Unity and the recognition it enjoys as
representative of Somalia including the regions of Somaliland and its people-citizens.
While the regional authority of “Somaliland” has a clear two fold game plan of
first getting “recognized” by participating in this meetings as a representative
of “part of the Somali territory and its authority” which can be used as a “Legal precedent “ in a Legal
case at international Forums/Courts. The meetings are hosted by a third party
like Turkey. Secondly to push as a second alternative in the negotiations for a
Confederate system of Governance between Somalia and the regional authority of “Somaliland”.
As Confederate I mean two different States with different sovereignty but under
a Confederate system for Somalia. In that way “Somaliland” regions authority
could have the rights to make new “ concessional Rights” for the Oil and Gas of
the Awdal regions and Sool and Sanag regions which are also claimed by the self
declared regional authority of Khatuma State which it says its part and parcel
of the Somali Federal Republic.
The game
plan of “Somaliland” regional Leaders came clear when they told the representative
of the UN Mission for Somalia that he cannot work and open office in Hargeisa
the capital city of the regional authority. In other words they are saying they
are not in his mandate as they are not part and parcel of Somalia. What has
always missed in their arguments was the legal basis for the “secession or
separation”. Because their narrative was always based on political arguments
like the Civil wars and the Human Rights abuses the Clan communities have suffered
in the 80 under the Siad Barre regime. Now through these meetings/negotiations
they are getting ammunition for a future legal challenge in International
Courts of Law by being “party” to these meetings/negotiations.
The Somali Provisional Constitution.
The Somali provisional constitution
is the supreme law of the land and is quite clear what is says about Somali sovereignty
and the legitimate representative of Somalia.
The Somali provisional Constitution although is incomplete the Constituent
Assembly of the Elders have delegated the federal Parliament “to remake the
Final draft”. But the Clan- Community representative as MP members of the
regions of “Somaliland” are in the Somali federal parliament. In the executive
they have they own share of seats as Ministers and also in the Judiciary.
The Act of Union of 1961 between the Colonial British Somaliland regions
of Somalia and the Italian regions of Somalia are still valid and part of the
Somali legal systems. The government of Hassan Sheik must be careful to handle
legal issues like this
meetings/negotiations concerning the Unity of the Somali “federal “Republic. I
use the word “federal” between brackets because till this Constitution is
approved in an Act of an elected Parliament and
in a national Referendum, we are still”the
Republic of Somalia legally”.
Back to the Drawing Board.
The government of Hassan Sheik Mohamud must go back to the drawing
board and prepare a “White paper” on this negotiations with the regional
authorities of “Somaliland”. When I say a “White paper” I mean a document on the Strategy and Goals approved
by the Council of Ministers or even
submitted and approved by the Somali federal Parliament. This strategy must be
told to all Somali people-citizens who are the national stake-holders including
all Clan- community from all regions of Somalia.
The strategy must be sub-divided in (1) Legal issues(2) Political issues
(3) and Cultural and Economic issues which have been explored and researched by
Somali professionals on those sectors.
If the things go on as they
are now mixing political issues and legal issues and “ recognizing” indirectly
the authority of the regions of “Somaliland” as “ party” or “legal entity”
different from the “indivisible sovereignty” of the Somali federal Republic there will be a “legal catastrophe” for the
Unity and Territorial integrity of the Nation-State called Somalia. Just to give you an example the
control of the Airspace of Somalia falls under the jurisdiction of the Somali Federal
Republic not regional Authorities who have the powers to deal directly with International
organizations like the International Civil Authority.
But in the meetings/negotiations the authority of the regions of
Somaliland has requested to control its regional “Airspace” as it was a “Sovereign
Legal Entity”. What I know is the two “ parties” they even nominated a
technical committee to deliberate later
on the subject.
This is not a “technical issue” but a “legal” one linked to the sovereignty
of the Republic as our Constitution mentions itself. If there are different
airspaces controlled by different authorities it will mean different Sovereign powers
having Jurisdiction on the Somali Republic territory. If the Somaliland
authority have its own Civil Aviation authority who shares the Powers to
control the air spaces of that region it will also mean two different Sovereign
States.
I hope the Somali federal government would understand that they do not
have the “legal authority” to Change the Territorial integrity and Unity of
Somalia if it’s not mandated by an Act of parliament and a National Referendum which
all Somali people-citizens have voted in a free and fair manner.
I suspect some of the
entourage of President Hassan Sheik, the so- called Salafist group called “Damu
Jadid”party, which controls this meetings/ negotiations as Ministers who are the natural allies of the
Somali Salafist Business cartels allied to what I call the hegemonic group of
Ethiopia-IGAD are behind this “Legal catastrophe” .This “legal -political
catastrophe “ in which the sovereignty ,territorial integrity and Unity of the
Somali federal Republic is amended/changed is illegal and in contravention of
the Somali Federal Constitution.
I do not believe the “Ruling Elites” of Mogadishu is not aware of this
Big Blunder/Legal treason but there is a “legal soft coup” they planned and executed
without the Knowledge of the Somali people-citizens. My conclusions is this
meetings/negotiations are all linked and part of the Old Plans of Ethiopia –IGAD
group and their sponsors of China,Iran,Russia,France and Italy to subdivide the
Somali Republic in five or six new Sovereign states to get its Oil and Gas.
Wait and see.
#Somalia: Short rebuttal to Matt Bryden interview on the Dai...
#Somalia: Short rebuttal to Matt Bryden interview on the Dai...: Mr. Bryden is one of those intellectuals who obfuscated Somali issues for a very long time and are without knowing maybe implementing t...
-
The Somalis have been subdivided for a very long time let's say from the 80" in clans- communities which are fighting each other f...
-
In these last week there has been a great controversy between the ruling clique or so-called elites of the Somali Republic which have ...
-
The New POLITICAL MAP of the SOMALI Speaking People(s) of the HORN of AFRICA Part 1.Wait and see. Above you can see t... -
INTRODUCTION: On 16 June MR. Abiy Ahmed PM of Ethiopia went to visit Mogadishu as part of his new political offensive ...
-
INTRODUCTION: In this post I will try to explain from the point of view of- a Somali from Somali Republic- if it can ...
-
In these days-from 23-06-2014- is raging in the airwaves-Somali radio FM and the BBCSomali and VOASomali- the latest controversy...
-
This is comment/analysis I prepared after I have read in the internet the last UN Monitoring Group on SOMALIA and partially printed in m...
-
My Hope is UNSOM,International Community will not follow blindly the wrong policies,strategies of IGAD-AMISOM-...
-
Mr. Bryden is one of those intellectuals who obfuscated Somali issues for a very long time and are without knowing maybe implementing t...
-
T his new post is the continuation of my last article entitled " WHO Runs he Show in Somalia?.The Salafist movement......"? Here ...
